
Considering the response approach
The guidelines suggest that simple questions should be answered with commands rather than code. I think paraphrasing the headline and providing implications would be best while asking what they want specifically. I'd like to avoid any unverified details since I know Lukaku has had injuries but I don't want to guess too much about specifics like dates. I’ll offer several options in my response, and if the network isn't accessible, I can still ask for approval before fetching any information.Crafting a concise response
Since I'm in the command line interface (CLI), I can ask if the user wants the source link. If they do, I can browse, but I only have access to tools like curl. Network access is enabled, so I should confirm this approach. I'll produce a short response that summarizes Lukaku's return to practice after his injury and then inquire what additional information they want, such as the original link, potential return time, impact on the next game, or details about his injury and recovery plan.
看到了这条:卢卡库今天随队完成合练,这是他自8月受伤以来首次,基本意味着进入复出倒计时;是否能立刻出场还要看合练后的反应和教练组评估。
你想了解哪部分?
- 原报道链接/更多细节
- 可能的复出时间与上场节奏
- 对下一场比赛的影响 
- 伤情背景与复健进展
